Tuesday, December 28, 2010

No--Redistribution of Wealth

To my way of thinking, the Conservatives are arguing against a straw man: relatively few progressives argue for redistribution of wealth anymore, according to which "from the rich, to the poor."

That argument is supplanted by the argument for supporting social programs:  Each individual ought to pay his fair share to support social programs, as an involuntary contribution to a non-profit organization, viz., the government, so as the financial obligations of the working poor and the impoverished, regardless of fault, are managed.  That is, a civilized society recognizes the need for a safety net, so that all might live within its realm of care. (Hume's concept of empathy.)

No comments: